Custom Search


Saturday 01 April 2006

Bronchodilator effect of salbutamol from two different spacer devices.

By: Li AM, Tsang T, Wong E, Chan D, Sung R, Ng PC.

Pediatr Pulmonol 2006 Apr;41(4):326-30

Our aim was to compare the bronchodilator effect of salbutamol delivered via a new holding chamber (Volumatic Soft, VS) with that of an established device (Volumatic, V) in asthmatic children. Children with stable asthma were recruited. They inhaled 100 microg, and 10 min later, 300 microg of salbutamol aerosol delivered via VS or V on day 1, and vice versa on day 2. Spirometry was measured at baseline, 10 min after 100 microg, and 15 min after 300 microg of salbutamol were given. The preference for either device was assessed by visual analogue score. Forty-four children with a median age of 9.2 years (interquartile range, 8.0-10.7) completed the study. There were significant improvements in forced expired volume in 1 sec (FEV1) with time throughout the study period for both V and VS (linear and quadratic trend P < 0.001). There was a statistically significant difference in postbronchodilator FEV1 between V and VS (P = 0.013). VS gave an overall greater change in FEV1 than V, by 1.8%. The preference scores for V and VS were 7.0 (IQR 5.0-8.0) and 9.0 (IQR 8.0-10.0) (p < 0.0005), respectively. In conclusion, comparable clinical efficacy was found for V and VS with respect to changes in FEV1 after salbutamol. Patients also showed a strong preference for the new device. 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Use of this site is subject to the following terms of use